The gap is closing
On LMArena (Chatbot Arena) the best closed model scores 1501 and the best open-weight model scores 1470. A gap of 31 Elo, down from more than 100. Capability is commoditising. Running it still costs money.
The closing frontier
■ Closed■ Open weights
2023
best closed vs open, gap 147 Elo
Each building is a model, climbing as it wins its matches.
In 2023, the best of them lived behind a wall.
Then the open models started to climb.
By 2025 they had drawn level.
Today the wall is a step.
But every one of these has to be powered.
Every AI model
competes in an arena.
Two models answer the same prompt.
A person picks the better reply.
Win, and you climb.
Lose, and you fall.
The score is called Elo.
The same idea behind chess rankings.
Three years of that contest,
laid out as a city.
Scroll
The smartest model stopped being the moat.
When every model is good enough, the question is no longer which one.
It is what it costs to keep them running.
What you just watched
Every building is an AI model. Slate is closed, sage is open weights. Height is its Elo.
Elo works like chess ranking. Two models answer the same prompt, a person picks the better reply, and the winner takes points from the loser. Millions of these votes on LMArena (Chatbot Arena) set every score. Over three years the open skyline climbed to within 31 Elo of the closed one.
Capability is becoming a commodity. The next constraint is energy. Someone has to power every one of these, and that bill only grows.
Knowing what your AI actually costs to run is the problem I work on at flowstate. Data: LMArena (Chatbot Arena) overall leaderboard, snapshot 2026-06-16.